
Scrum Master Performance: 5 important KPIs for evaluation
Scrum masters are like soccer coaches. They make sure that the team successfully completes the right tasks at the right time. Most importantly, make sure that the team is satisfied during the process. This way, they ensure that the entire team - i.e. the department or the organization - achieves its goals.
But how can Scrum Master performance be evaluated? As with soccer coaches, the question for Scrum Masters is what part they play in the success - or failure - of projects. So how can you measure how well a Scrum Master is leading their team? We take an in-depth look at how you can evaluate Scrum Master performance and which KPIs are relevant.
Important note first: Scrum Master performance is not a single number. A good assessment combines delivery data, team health, retrospective effectiveness, action-item tracking, and qualitative observations. That is precisely why you need not only metrics, but also the right Scrum Master tools to make signals visible on a regular basis and discuss them within the team. You can find an overview of suitable tool categories here: Scrum Master tools for retrospectives, team health, and Scrum rituals.
Isn’t a single KPI enough for Scrum Master Performance Review?
The success of a company usually depends on the value of the product supplied and how satisfied customers are with it. These two factors are decisive for how often a product is purchased. Doesn’t a Scrum Master therefore have to be measured exclusively on this basis?
Or couldn’t you simply conduct Scrum Master performance appraisal by checking whether Scrum Masters are obsolete? After all, if they get the team to work in a self-organized way, evaluate themselves, and put out an excellent product, they have fulfilled their goal. They are then - at least in theory - obsolete.
If you want a quick and simplified solution, then the answer to both questions is “yes”.
However, that only scratches the surface of a Scrum Master performance review. To find out where Scrum Masters create value, you need to look at KPIs that go beyond that. Good KPIs answer above all three questions:
- Delivery: Is work delivered reliably without quality and focus suffering?
- Collaboration: Are trust, clarity, and psychological safety improving within the team?
- Improvement: Are blockers, retrospective insights, and action items being consistently tracked?
This way, you uncover where Scrum Masters are getting the most out of their work - and where they can still improve. This has an impact on the performance of the team and the value of the end product. In turn, this has an impact on customer satisfaction and thus on revenue for your company. Now, let’s get into the details!

Scrum Master Performance KPI #1: Sprint Goals Delivery
The KPI Sprint Goals Delivery reveals whether a team achieves its sprint goals on time. The decisive factor here is whether it can consistently meet the goals set by the development team (DEV) and product owner (PO).
To measure Sprint Goals Delivery, you can use these metrics, for example:
Burn Down Charts: Burn down charts graphically represent how much work is left to do compared to the total work in the remaining time. Since the development team maintains the charts daily, you get insight into whether a sprint or project is on schedule. You can see how fast a team is working and how well they can estimate their tasks.
Burn Up Charts: Burn Up Charts show you how much work has been completed compared to the total work. They include changes to the scope or scale of a project. Like burn down charts, they provide insight into how quickly a project is progressing. They thus allow forecasts for further progress.
Predictability: Predictability measures the ratio of “planned” to “completed”. In doing so, the metric documents how much work a team committed to at the beginning of the sprint and how much they completed at the end of the sprint.
Tools like Jira, Rally, and Version One automatically generate helpful charts such as burn down charts. For Scrum Masters, it is important not to treat these metrics as pure control figures. They are conversation starters: Why did the scope change? Which dependency slowed down the sprint? Was the sprint goal formulated clearly enough?

Scrum Master Performance KPI #2: Continuous Improvement
“Continuous Improvement” stands for the goal of an agile team to continuously develop and improve. Pursuing this goal is one of the key responsibilities of the Scrum Master as the person who is conducting agile retrospectives - the key ceremony in agile. You can evaluate “continuous improvemeng” looking at some of the following metrics:
Team interaction
As a facilitator, coach and servant leader, the Scrum Master must ensure that team members interact with each other. This ensures that the team sets realistic goals, achieves them on time - and, of course, ensures a healthy working environment. Although this metric is more subjective than others, it shows the state of team communication and thus team success. You can measure interaction, for example, through observations and team feedback in retrospectives.
Velocity
Velocity measures how quickly a team delivers results based on subjective estimates. This makes the KPI a rough measure of productivity that should be treated with caution. Because the measure is so subjective, few deductions can be made from it. Nevertheless, it is practical and can be taken into a retrospective as one of several indications for targeted reflection. By the way, more information on this can be found in this article: A comparison of 25 agile metrics and the best agile metric.
Quality of actions
An often underestimated performance indicator is the quality of actions from retrospectives. Are actions formulated concretely? Do they have owners? Are they revisited in the next retro? If retrospectives generate lots of discussion but hardly any follow-up, Scrum Master performance is not yet where it should be.
“I like the employee, but they aren't performing as desired. How can I address this in 1:1s?”
Solve this challenge"Sometimes I’m not sure if I was too harsh - or too soft - in my 1:1s to be effective."
Solve this challenge"I can’t identify patterns or trends across my 1:1s. Everything feels isolated."
Solve this challengeDealing with impediments
If obstacles and impediments arise in processes, Scrum Masters are responsible for removing them. You can measure how effectively Scrum Masters are solving them through using a “impediment log”. You can create a simple Jira page for this, put down larger and smaller impediments there and take them with you to the retrospective on a regular basis.
Customer satisfaction
Ultimately, a constant increase in the quality of your teamwork also has an impact on the final product and thus customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is therefore –, as already stated at the beginning –, also linked to the performance of the Scrum Master. I’ll show you below how you can measure this (see “Delivering Value”).

Scrum Master Performance KPI #3: Trust
Team members who trust each other work together particularly efficiently. Trust is therefore one of the most important characteristics of a healthy team and thus also of the work of a Scrum Master. In order for trust to develop in teams, Scrum Masters must above all live trust. To do this, they must lead their team in a serving manner - you may have heard of “Servant Leadership”.
Measuring trust is not easy without tools. This is because the metric is often subjective. However, you can achieve a certain level of objectivity by continuously observing your team, writing down exciting situations and observations, and thus having indicators for trust that you can take into the retrospective - in order to then work on the topics.
That is exactly the goal of Echometer, by the way. The tool helps you to track various Outputs & Outcomes to make your Scrum Master performance measurable, to display it in Echometer dashboards - and at the same time to make it part of your retrospective.
By the way, you can find examples of this in the linked article: 5 examples of outputs & outcomes from retrospectives.
You can have a brief look into our Scrum Master Performance tool Echometer brings you this video from our co-founder (Scrum Master & Psychologist) Christian: 2 minute video. Take a look, I can highly recommend!
To make it short, one of the most important mechanisms of the tool is the following: The outcomes of retros are measured regularly - and discussed together in so-called health check retros.
An indication of Scrum Master performance is, for example, whether the 5 agile Scrum values are implemented, visible in the daily life of the team. Do the appropriate retro to make this measurable! This is what it looks like in Echometer. Feel free to take a look, you might even try it out with your team:
Note: This retrospective format asks for agreement with the given Health Check items on a scale.
- Courage: We value people showing courage.
- Respect: We value each other’s ideas, even when disagreeing.
- Commitment: Every team member is committed to follow through on what they have promised.
- Focus: We don’t allow ourselves to be distracted from reaching the sprint goal.
- Openness: We are open to constructive feedback and grow from it.
Scrum Master Performance KPI #4: Team Happiness
Like “Trust”, “Happiness” – i.e. team satisfaction – is a relevant metric to measure Scrum Master performance. This is because two important preconditions for how well team members can perform are: Morale and happiness. In practice, this means that if Scrum Masters ensure that employees are satisfied, they are also likely to do a better job.
To measure satisfaction, you can observe employees and regularly ask how they feel with their work, for example through a happiness diagram in a retro. Again, you can the Echometer software tool for doing so. The results are discussed in retrospectives and action items are derived on the basis of the psychological inputs of the tool.

Which tools help with measuring Scrum Master performance?
For a serious Scrum Master performance evaluation, you usually need several data sources:
| Measurement area | Typical source | What Scrum Masters should pay attention to |
|---|---|---|
| Sprint goals and forecasts | Jira, Linear, Azure DevOps | Not just count output, but reflect on goal clarity and dependencies |
| Retrospectives and actions | Echometer, Parabol, TeamRetro | Check the quality, accountability, and implementation of actions |
| Team health and trust | Echometer health checks, pulse checks | Make trends visible over time and discuss them within the team |
| Delivery value | Product metrics, customer feedback, support data | Classify the impact on customer value and product quality |
| Coaching and development | 1:1s, observations, stakeholder feedback | Collect patterns, do not overrate individual situations |
If you are looking for a lean setup for this, the tool overview will help you further: Scrum Master tools: software, techniques, and selection criteria.
Scrum Master Performance KPI #5: Delivering Value
One of the most important Scrum Master performance goals - or actually the goal of the team and your organization - is to deliver as much value as possible to the customer with your product. You can use these metrics to determine if you’ve succeeded:
Customer reviews
Customer reviews give you a precise insight into how satisfied buyers are with a product. This shows you what value a Scrum Master has indirectly created with his team. You can collect feedback from customers using tools such as SurveyMonkey.
Usage statistics
Products typically have mechanisms that are measuring their usage. While increased product usage is no guarantee that customers are satisfied with a product, it is still an indicator of how good a product has become and thus how much value has been generated.
Support inquiries
If you evaluate the number and kind of support requests, you will get a picture of the problems and possibly bugs that a finished product or increment has. Based on this, you can also draw conclusions about the generated value and its quality.
Product sales
Ultimately, a product should and must generate sales so that the team can be remunerated. High revenue, especially in comparison to the competition, could therefore also be an indicator of a high product value. If available, you can take into account sales figures. However, the relationship to Scrum Master performance is certainly less strong here than, for example, the relationship to trust in the team.

Conclusion on Scrum Master Performance Evaluation
A Scrum Master Performance Review only seems difficult at first glance. In practice, however, you can fall back on numerous metrics with which you can draw conclusions about the Scrum Master performance.
These metrics are closely linked to the Scrum Master Performance Goals. Because: Even for Scrum Masters, the KPIs are an important indicator of how your project is progressing. It may sound obvious, but to be clear: Team Happiness, Customer Satisfaction and Delivering Value are therefore not just KPIs for evaluating Scrum Master performance, but are also examples of the core goals of a Scrum Master’s work.
Many tools that you already use for an agile way of working (Jira & Co.) automatically provide you with a few relevant reports and analyzes in order to carry out a Scrum Master Performance Evaluation. That means: in the best case scenario, you have little effort to get a feeling for the performance.
If you not only want to measure Scrum Master performance, but also want to develop your entire organization, you should take a look at our free eBook: 12 Team workshops from a psychological perspective.
The workshops are primarily aimed at one thing: developing an agile mindset. A good Scrum Master tool setup can also help with the latter: sprint tracking for delivery signals, retrospectives for learning, health checks for team dynamics, and action-item tracking for real change. We explain this connection in more detail in the article Scrum Master tools: software, techniques, and selection criteria.
FAQ: measuring Scrum Master performance
How do you measure Scrum Master performance sensibly?
Scrum Master performance is not measured sensibly with a single KPI, but with a combination of delivery metrics, team health, retrospective effectiveness, action tracking, and qualitative observations.
What is important is that the numbers are not used as a control instrument. They should serve as a starting point for conversation: Where is the team losing focus? Which blockers keep recurring? Which actions really lead to better collaboration?
More context can be found here: Scrum Master performance KPIs
Which KPIs are important for Scrum Master performance?
Important KPIs for Scrum Master performance are Sprint Goals Delivery, Continuous Improvement, Trust, team satisfaction, and Delivering Value.
These KPIs should be considered together. Velocity or Burndown Charts alone say little about whether a Scrum Master is doing a good job. What matters is whether the team delivers more reliably, works together better, and consistently implements concrete improvements.
Deep dive: Scrum Master Performance Review
Which tools help with Scrum Master performance measurement?
Several tool categories help with Scrum Master performance measurement: sprint tracking tools such as Jira or Linear, retrospective tools, team health checks, action tracking, and, where needed, 1:1 tools.
Echometer is especially suitable when Scrum Masters want to connect team health, retrospectives, and action items in one workflow. Project management tools tend to show what is happening. Retrospectives and health checks help understand why it is happening and what the team should improve.
You can find a broader overview here: Scrum Master tools at a glance
Is velocity a good KPI for Scrum Master performance?
Velocity can be a helpful topic of conversation, but on its own it is not a good KPI for Scrum Master performance. It is based on subjective estimates and can easily be misinterpreted.
It makes more sense to look at velocity together with sprint goals, the quality of the actions taken, team health, trust, and delivering value. If velocity increases but team health declines or quality suffers, that is not a good sign.
“I like the employee, but they aren't performing as desired. How can I address this in 1:1s?”
Solve this challenge"Sometimes I’m not sure if I was too harsh - or too soft - in my 1:1s to be effective."
Solve this challenge"I can’t identify patterns or trends across my 1:1s. Everything feels isolated."
Solve this challenge








